Department or State institution:
Type of Report:
Date Report Submitted:
1. The appointment by the Treasury of service providers to render consultancy services to the Internal Audit Unit and Infrastructure Management and Economic Services Unit of the Treasury in a manner that was (a) not
fair, equitable, transparent, competitive or cost-effective; (b) contrary to applicable (i) legislation; (ii) manuals, guidelines, circulars, practice notes or instructions issued by the National Treasury or the Treasury; or (iii)
manuals, policies, procedures, prescripts, instructions or practices of or applicable to the Treasury; (c) conducted by or facilitated through the improper or unlawful conduct of (i) employees or officials of the Treasury; (ii) any
other person or entity; to corruptly or unduly benefit themselves or others; or (d) fraudulent.
2. Any unauthorised, irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred by the Treasury or the State in respect of the appointment of the service providers referred to in para 1 of this Schedule to render consultancy services
to the IAU and IMESU of the Treasury.
3. Fraud, corruption, irregularities, malpractices or maladministration regarding the affairs of the Treasury in relation to the (a) appointment of the service providers referred to in para 1 of this schedule; (b) selective investigation
of matters reported to the IAU of the Treasury; (c) administration of the Municipal Finance Support Programme, including the causes of such fraud, corruption, irregularities, malpractices or maladministration and any losses,
damage or actual or potential prejudice suffered by the Treasury or the State.
4. Any improper or unlawful conduct by the employees or officials of the Treasury, the service providers referred to in para 1 of this Schedule or any other person or entity, in relation to the allegations set out in para 1 to 3 of this